<IMG SRC="/images/headerbanners/pam.gif" WIDTH=423 HEIGHT=90 BORDER=0">



FPSC Comments on Consultation Draft Regarding OSC-FSCO Merger

June 29, 2001

Mr. John R. O'Toole, M.P.P.
Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister of Finance
7 Queen's Park Crescent
Frost Building South, 7th Floor
Toronto, ON M7A 1Y7

 

Dear Mr. O'Toole:

Re: Establishing a Single Financial Services Regulator - Consultation Draft.

As the standard setting body that awards the Certified Financial Planner® (CFP®) designation in Canada, Financial Planners Standards Council (FPSC) has a significant interest in the proposed merger of the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) and the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO).

The merger will obviously affect over 6,500 CFP professionals who work in Ontario, a high percentage of whom are licensed to sell mutual funds and/or insurance products. We also recognize that the merger may be used as a template for future consolidation on a national level, which will obviously affect over 6,000 Canadian advisors currently licensed to use the CFP designation in other provinces.

We are concerned by what appears to be an uneven and disproportionate distribution of power within the structure of the proposed Ontario Financial Services Commission as set out in the consultation draft. The province's pension and insurance sectors are significantly larger than the securities industry not only in the number of people they employ, but also in the extent of assets under administration. The governance structure as proposed, however, creates a Board of Directors in which OSC members could outnumber FSCO members by more than three to one. It also seems insurance and pensions fall under the supervision of one or two Superintendents, who would be employees ranking below both the Vice-Chairs and the Chair.

We think it unreasonable that the securities regulator should completely dominate the new Ontario Financial Services Commission. In order to maintain balance and retain appropriate regulatory expertise, FPSC believes that two persons with an extensive background in the insurance and pension sectors should be named Deputy Chairs for insurance and pensions respectively. FPSC envisions these new Deputy Chairs as positions senior to those of the Vice-Chairs.

We also believe that representatives from the insurance and pension sectors should have an opportunity to play a much more significant role in the amalgamation process, and that a task force made up of industry representatives should be established in order to examine these issues in greater detail before proceeding with undue haste.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this important legislation.

Yours sincerely,
Donald J. Johnston, President


Make a name for someone special in our professional.

See stats on CFP licensees.